MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014431621 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.130371

Treatment of Relapsing Polychondritis with Tocilizumab

2013· letter· en· W2014431621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOtitis Media and Relapsing Polychondritis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChugai Pharmaceutical
KeywordsRelapsing polychondritisChondritisMedicineTocilizumabTenosynovitisCyclophosphamideChondropathySynovitisRefractory (planetary science)EtanerceptEpiscleritisSurgeryScleritisInternal medicineDermatologyArthritisRheumatoid arthritisChemotherapyImmunologyOsteoarthritisPathologyUveitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: We read with interest the letter from Wallace and Stone1 describing a patient with relapsing polychondritis (RP) refractory to corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers. The patient’s biological inflammation and clinical symptoms of chondritis responded well after each tocilizumab (TCZ) infusion. We describe a somewhat different experience of TCZ efficacy in a patient with RP. A 46-year-old woman was diagnosed with RP in 2000 with recurrent episodes of chondritis and mainly synovitis and tenosynovitis. After failure … Address correspondence to Dr. Wendling; E-mail: dwendling{at}chu-besancon.fr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it