MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014451242 · doi:10.2118/110040-pa

Different Methods To Avoid Annular Pressure Buildup by Appropriate Engineered Sealant and Applying Best Practices (Cementing and Drilling)

2009· article· en· W2014451242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Drilling & Completion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsHaliburton Forest & Wild Life Reserve
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)Petroleum engineeringCementCasingCompletion (oil and gas wells)DrillingWellboreSlurryInjection wellCoiled tubingEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Many wells that have been successfully cemented initially are showing annulus pressure buildup because of damaged cement- sheath integrity by post-cementing operations/conditions. This has been a concern by many operators where wellbores may be exposed to severe conditions and/or production regimes over a period of time. Sometimes this problem can be temporarily dealt with by releasing the annulus pressure, if environmental conditions and well type will allow. However, this method of annular gas production relief is not a long-term solution to the problem. In addition, it is not always possible to reduce the annulus pressure by releasing the trapped pressure into the environment on a regular basis, even if all other conditions permit this operation. An engineered cement-slurry system can save the operator from facing this situation by applying a lifetime zonal isolation remedy through the proper cement job design. Gas injection in specific areas in the UAE is performed to help maximize the production from these development fields. This paper will discuss the process of engineering a cementing system for these gas-injection wells and the development of a solution that has successfully protected wellbores in gas-injection areas where high pressures are applied to the wellbore. By treating the cement under defined wellbore conditions and studying the mechanical behavior of the cement sheath, it was possible to design a cement- slurry system that could withstand the high pressures applied through gas-injection operations. The mechanical behavior was evaluated using 3D finite element analysis (FEA) that considers mechanical properties such as Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and tensile strength in addition to confined compressive strength. The importance of complete zonal isolation is of high order. Elastic cement designs have provided a resilient nonfoamed, or conventional, system that successfully isolated the wellbores for more than a dozen gas-injection wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it