MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014486734 · doi:10.1159/000072897

Effect of Different Levels of Pressure Support and Proportional Assist Ventilation on Breathing Pattern, Work of Breathing and Gas Exchange in Mechanically Ventilated Hypercapnic COPD Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

2003· article· en· W2014486734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiration · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePressure support ventilationCOPDVentilation (architecture)Work of breathingTidal volumeAnesthesiaRespiratory rateMechanical ventilationRespiratory failureRespiratory minute volumeRespiratory systempCO2Peak inspiratory pressureInternal medicineBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Background:</i> Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified. <i>Objectives:</i> To compare the effect of PAV and PSV on respiratory parameters of hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). <i>Methods:</i> Nine intubated hypercapnic COPD patients were placed on the PAV or PSV mode in random sequence. For each mode, four levels (L<sub>1</sub>–L<sub>4</sub>) of support were applied. At each level, blood gases, flow, tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>), airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes) (n = 7), patient respiratory rate (fp), ventilator rate (fv), missing efforts (ME = fp – fv) were measured. <i>Results:</i> We found increases in ME with increasing levels of PSV but not with PAV. PO<sub>2 </sub>and V<sub>T</sub> increased whereas PCO<sub>2 </sub>decreased significantly with increasing levels of PSV (p < 0.05). With PAV, PCO<sub>2 </sub>decreased and V<sub>T </sub>increased significantly only at L<sub>4</sub> whereas PO<sub>2 </sub>increased from L<sub>1</sub> to L<sub>4</sub>. Runaways were observed at L<sub>3 </sub>and L<sub>4 </sub>of PAV. The pressure-time product (PTP) was determined for effective and missing breaths. The mean total PTP per minute (of effective plus missing breaths) was 160 ± 57 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/s·min in PSV and 194 ± 60 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/s·min in PAV. <i>Conclusion:</i> We conclude that in COPD patients with hypercapnic ARF, with increasing support, PSV causes the appearance of ME whereas PAV develops runaway phenomena, due to the different patient-ventilator interaction; however, these do not limit the improvement of blood gases with the application of both methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it