MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014490378 · doi:10.1089/dna.2011.1261

Lysyl Oxidase G473A Polymorphism Is Associated with Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Diseases

2011· article· en· W2014490378 on OpenAlexaff
Lan Ma, Haihan Song, Meiyan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA and Cell Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial metabolism and enzyme function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioBiologyGenotypeLysyl oxidaseAlleleConfidence intervalCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineRestriction fragment length polymorphismPolymorphism (computer science)Case-control studyAllele frequencyGeneticsGastroenterologyGeneExtracellular matrixMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysyl oxidase (LOX) plays a crucial role in the maintenance of extracellular matrix stability and could participate in vascular remodeling associated with cardiovascular diseases. A novel polymorphism in the LOX gene, G473A (rs1800449), was identified. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between LOX G473A polymorphism and susceptibility to coronary artery diseases (CADs) in Chinese population. The LOX variant G473A was detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in 656 CAD cases and 718 age-matched controls. Frequencies of LOX 473 AA genotype and A allele were significantly higher in patients with CAD than in controls (odds ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.95, p = 0.002; and odds ratio = 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.67, p = 0.001). Our data suggest that the G473A polymorphism of LOX gene is associated with increased susceptibility to CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA and Cell BiologySame topicMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionFrench-language works237,207