Keratin-mediated resistance to stress and apoptosis in simple epithelial cells in relation to health and disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epithelial cells such as hepatocytes exhibit highly polarized properties as a result of the asymmetric distribution of subsets of receptors at unique portions of the surface membrane. While the proper targeting of these surface receptors and maintenance of the resulting polarity depend on microtubules (MTs), the Golgi sorting compartment, and different actin-filament networks, the contribution of keratin intermediate filaments (IFs) has been unclear. Recent data show that the latter cytoskeletal network plays a predominant role in providing resistance to various forms of stress and to apoptosis targeted to the surface membrane. In this context, we first summarize our knowledge of the domain- or assembly-related features of IF proteins and the dynamic properties of IF networks that may explain how the same keratin pair K8/K18 can exert multiple resistance-related functions in simple epithelial cells. We then examine the contribution of linker protein(s) that integrate interactions of keratin IFs with MTs and the actin-cytoskeleton network, polarity-dependent surface receptors and cytoplasmic organelles. We next address likely molecular mechanisms by which K8/K18 can selectively provide resistance to a mechanical or toxic stress, or to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Finally, these issues on keratin structure-function are examined within a context of pathological anomalies emerging in tissue architecture as a result of natural or targeted mutations, or posttranslational modifications at specific amino acid residues. Clearly. the data accumulated in recent years provide new and significant insights on the role of K8/K18, particularly under conditions where polarized cells resist to stressful or apoptotic insults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".