MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014551497 · doi:10.1089/gyn.2004.20.81

Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomies (How Many Are Potentially Preventable?): A 28-Year Experience in Saskatoon

2004· article· en· W2014551497 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amos A. Akinbiyi, Olufemi A. Olatunbosun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gynecologic Surgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsRoyal University HospitalRegina General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUterine atonyHysterectomyPlacenta accretaChorioamnionitisUterine ruptureObstetricsRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Postoperative feverPregnancySurgeryGestational ageUterusPlacentaFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We sought to determine the frequency, contributory factors, and morbidity of emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) in our obstetric population, and suggest means for preventing this drastic surgical intervention. Methods: This was a retrospective review of the records of patients who had EOH during a 28-year period (1965–1993) at the Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon. We analyzed the patients' histories, operative reports, postoperative care, and perinatal outcomes. Results: There were 56 cases of EOH among a total of 30290 deliveries, representing an incidence of 1 in 541 deliveries (1.9 per 1000 deliveries). The mean age of the patients was 29.5 years. The surgical method applied in 50 cases (89.3%) was total hysterectomy while six (10.7%) had subtotal hysterectomy. Uterine atony was the leading indication for EOH (48.2%), followed by placenta accreta (26.8%), uterine rupture (10.7%), chorioamnionitis (10.7%), and extension of the lower uterine segment cesarean incision (3.6%). Hysterectomies performed for uterine atony was associated with grand multiparity (p < 0.0072), previous cesarean section (p < 0.5), chorioamnionitis (p < 0.26), previous postpartum hemorrhage (p < 0.08), oxytocin augmentation (p < 0.005), mean birthweight (p < 0.22), and tocolytic administration (p < 0.36). P values < 0.05 were considered significant. There was an associated high maternal morbidity: febrile morbidity, 55%; ureteric injuries, 41%; blood transfusion, 36%; pulmonary atelectasis, 32%; wound infection, 30%; psychological disturbance, 23%; and pelvic abscess, 16%, although maternal and perinatal mortalities were low (1.8%) and 6%, respectively). Conclusions: Uterine atony is a significant risk factor for EOH. Two-thirds of EOHs might have been prevented if adequate uterine contractility had been achieved at cesarean section or vaginal delivery. It should be stated clearly that prompt performance of obstetric hysterectomy before the patient's clinical condition deteriorates is the main key to success. Reduction of the frequency of uterine atony is achievable with the use of newer prostaglandin uterotonics. These agents may contribute to a reduction in the incidence of EOH. (J GYNECOL SURG 20:81)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gynecologic SurgerySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207