MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014571024 · doi:10.7202/037219ar

Stratégie pour la détection semi-automatique des néologismes de presse

2007· article· fr· W2014571024 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María Teresa Cabré, Lluís de Yzaguirre

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stratégie pour la détection semi-automatique des néologismes de presse – Les auteurs présentent l'Observatori de Neologia de Barcelona (OBNEB). L'un des objectifs de l'organisme est la détection de la néologie formelle dans la presse écrite. L'article expose les concepts de base qui sont en rapport avec la néologie. Puis il décrit les méthodes de travail de l'OBNEB. Ensuite, les caractéristiques du corpus sont détaillées. Ce corpus est riche de sept millions d'occurrences provenant du dépouillement de textes journalistiques. Les premiers essais d'extraction semi-automatique des néologismes ont été menés à partir de ces données. Enfin, les auteurs expliquent le fonctionnement du logiciel qui est utilisé pour repérer et pour traiter les néologismes. Ce logiciel a été mis au point à l'Institut universitari de lingüística aplicada de la Universitat Pompeu Fabra. D'autres informations sur les travaux des auteurs peuvent être consultées à l'adresse suivante : « http://www.iula.upf.es ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTTR traduction terminologie rédactionSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207