MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014585108 · doi:10.1021/la025867k

Stabilization of α-Chymotrypsin and Lysozyme Entrapped in Water-in-Silicone Oil Emulsions

2002· article· en· W2014585108 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysozymeEmulsionSilicone oilDenaturation (fissile materials)ChemistryChymotrypsinSiliconeChromatographyPulmonary surfactantEnzymeChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryTrypsinBiochemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A system of entrapping proteinaceous material in water-in-silicone oil emulsions using silicone surfactants is described. Although contact between cyclic and linear silicones and proteins is well-known to facilitate protein/enzyme denaturation, the additional presence of silicones bearing a few hydrophilic groups (silicone surfactants) in these W/O systems dramatically lowers the degree of protein denaturation. Spectrophotometric activity assays of α-chymotrypsin and lysozyme performed using a UV/visible spectrophotometer revealed that the enzymes entrapped within these emulsion systems retain activity that is equal to, or in some cases greater than, that of controls. The results suggest that these emulsions are a viable means by which to store proteinaceous materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it