Time-frequency analysis of deep crustal reflection seismic data using Wigner-Ville distributions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One important component of deep crustal reflection seismic data in the absence of drill-hole data and surface-outcrop constraints is classifying and quantifying reflectivity patterns. One approach to this component uses a recently developed data-decomposition technique, seismic skeletonization. Skeletonized coherent events and their attributes are identified and stored in a relational database, allowing easy visualization and parameterization of the reflected wavefield. Because one useful attribute, the instantaneous frequency, is difficult to derive within the current framework of skeletonization, timefrequency analysis and a new method, empirical mode skeletonization, are used to derive it. Other attributes related to timefrequency analysis that can be derived from the methods can be used for shallow and deep reflection seismic interpretation and can supplement the seismic attributes accrued from seismic skeletonization. Bright reflections observed from below the sedimentary basin in the Southern Alberta Lithosphere Transect have recently been interpreted to be caused by highly reflective sills. Timefrequency analysis of one of these reflections shows the lateral variation of energy with instantaneous frequency for any given time and the lateral variation of energy with time for any instantaneous frequency. Results from empirical mode skeletonization for the same segment of data illustrate the differences in the instantaneous frequencies among the intrinsic modes of the data. Thus, timefrequency distribution of amplitude or energy for any signal may be a good indicator of compositional differences that can vary from one location to another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".