MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014608909 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v1n2p48

Purification and Characterization of the Lipase from Marine Vibrio fischeri

2009· article· en· W2014608909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipaseVibrioEnzymeAmmoniumChromatographySubstrate (aquarium)BiochemistrySpecific activityEnzyme assayChemistrySubstrate specificityMonomerBiologyBacteriaOrganic chemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipolytic enzymes from marine microbes have been the focus of intense and growing research. The bioluminescencebacterium Vibrio fischeri was produced lipase enzyme when the medium contained specific substrate. The lipase waspurified from the concentrated culture supernatant. The most active fractions were obtained using the technique ofprecipitation with ammonium sulphate. The precipitated fraction was purified by desalting and ion exchangechromatography. The purified active fraction exhibiting final specific activity of 121U/mg and characterized; theoptimum pH was likely between 7 to 8, the optimum temperature was 30°C and about 80 % of activity at 5°C. Theenzyme was very stable at the pH 8, at the temperature 30°C. The enzyme was monomeric protein having molecularmass of 57 KDa estimated by native PAGE assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it