Human <i>GLUD1</i> and <i>GLUD2</i> glutamate dehydrogenase localize to mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme central to glutamate metabolism, is thought to localize to the mitochondrial matrix, although there are also suggestions for the extramitochondrial presence of this protein. Whereas GDH in mammals is encoded by the GLUD1 gene, humans and the great apes have, in addition, a GLUD2 gene showing a distinct expression pattern. The encoded hGDH1 and hGDH2 isoenzymes are highly homologous, but their leader sequences are more divergent. To explore their subcellular targeting, we constructed expression vectors in which hGDH1 or hGDH2 was fused with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and used these to transfect COS 7, HeLa, CHO, HEK293, or neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cells. Confocal microscopy revealed GDH-EGFP fluorescence in the cytoplasm within coarse structures. Cotransfection experiments using organelle-specific markers revealed that hGDH1 or hGDH2 colocalized with the mitochondrial marker DsRed2-Mito and to a lesser extent with the endoplasmic reticulum marker DsRed2-ER. Western blots detected two GDH-EGFP specific bands: a ~90 kDa band and a ~95 kDa band associated with the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum containing cytosol, respectively. Deletion of the signal sequence, while altering drastically the fluoresce distribution within the cell, prevented GDH from entering the mitochondria, with the ~90 kDa band being retained in the cytosol. In addition, the deletion eliminated the ~95 kDa band from cell lysates, thus confirming that it represents the full-length GDH. Hence, while most of the hGDHs translocate into the mitochondria (a process associated with cleavage of the signal sequence), part of the protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum, probably serving additional functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".