MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014626231 · doi:10.1558/sols.v5i3.423

La francophonie et ses contradictions: multiples positions, multiples intérêts [The francophonie and its contradictions: multiple positions, multiple interests]

2012· article· en· W2014626231 on OpenAlex
Monica Heller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociolinguistic Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityIdeologySociologyDemocracyPoliticsOrder (exchange)Late modernityHumanitiesEpistemologySocial sciencePhilosophyPolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article I use a framework taken from political economy in order to describe and explain the role of French in processes of symbolic domination (Bourdieu 1982). The construction of the nation-State went hand in hand with a specific form of capitalist expansion – liberal and democratic – legimitized through distinctively modernist ideologies (Hobsbawm 1990). This expansion takes now forms different enough to claim that in our time we are immersed in high modernity (Giddens 1990). At the same time, it maintains enough continuities to describe it not as a post modernity but as a (high) form of modernity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it