MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014666110 · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/15/9/035

Single-frequency pulsed laser oscillator and system for laser-ultrasonics

2004· article· en· W2014666110 on OpenAlexaff
Lionel Carrion, Alain Blouin, Christian Padioleau, Paul Bouchard, Jean‐Pierre Monchalin

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolid State Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaserMaterials scienceAcousticsOpticsPulsed laserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: We present a new pulsed laser oscillator and system for the optical detection of ultrasound in materials. A single-frequency laser oscillator based on a pulse pumped Nd:YAG rod inside a ring cavity is proposed. The laser delivers single-frequency pulses of 35 W power. Power of about 1 kW can be obtained when the second rod of a dual-rod pumping chamber is used as an amplifier. Performance of the system is then investigated with a GaAs photorefractive crystal-based two-wave mixing phase demodulator. In particular, the intensity noise of the laser can be made low enough to allow the detection limit to be set by the shot-noise of the laser. The coherence length of the laser is about 20 m, which makes it a versatile laser-ultrasonic inspection system operated with a two-wave mixing based phase demodulator. A complete compact and affordable system is obtained when the second rod of the pumping chamber is used as a generation laser of ultrasound. Tests of this laser-ultrasonic system on metallic samples are presented. In that case the second rod of the pumping chamber is used as an ultrasound generation laser. Introduction: Laser generation and detection of ultrasound presents numerous advantages for material inspection and characterization over classical piezoelectric-based techniques [1]. In particular, lasers allow probing parts with complex shape in severe conditions, such as high temperature or parts moving at high speed on a production line [2]. A laser-ultrasonic system is typically made of two units, one for generation and another one for detection of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicSolid State Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207