MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Analysis for the Nonlinear Free Vibration of Shallow Shells

2002· article· en· W2014670312 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Singh, Lan Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrilateralVibrationNonlinear systemMathematical analysisMathematicsDisplacement (psychology)Boundary value problemGeometryNumerical analysisAlgebraic equationMatrix (chemical analysis)Boundary (topology)Algebraic numberPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringFinite element methodMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variational approach for the nonlinear free vibration of shallow shells having a quadrilateral boundary is presented in this paper. Natural coordinates ξ and η are used to map the prescribed geometry in the x-y plane. Displacement fields corresponding to u, v, w, β1, and β2 are expressed in terms of the product of two algebraic functions, the form of which is so chosen that the displacement boundary condition can be imposed by manipulating the coefficients. In arriving at the stiffness matrix, no simplification is applied to the nonlinear strains and the variation of the complete energy equation is considered. For the plate problems numerical results are obtained and compared with approximate analytical results by other researchers. Numerical results for the shallow shells are also presented and their characteristics are found to be significantly different from the results for the plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering MechanicsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207