MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014687054 · doi:10.1242/jeb.00839

Sodium and potassium currents of larval zebrafish muscle fibres

2004· article· en· W2014687054 on OpenAlexaff
Steven D. Buckingham, Declan W. Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepolarizationBiophysicsChemistryTetrodotoxinPotassiumMembrane potentialSodiumRepolarizationResting potentialCardiac transient outward potassium currentAnatomyElectrophysiologyBiologyPatch clampNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steady-state and kinetic properties of Na(+) and K(+) currents of inner (white) and outer (red) muscles of zebrafish larvae 4-6 days post-fertilization (d.p.f.) are described. In inner muscle, the outward currents were half-activated at -1.0 mV and half-inactivated at -30.4 mV, and completely inactivated within 100 ms of depolarization. The inward currents of inner fibres were half-activated at -7.3 mV and half-inactivated at -74.5 mV and completely inactivated within 5 ms of depolarization. Inner muscle fibres were found to support action potentials, while no action potentials could be evoked in outer muscles. In inner muscle fibres, all tested levels of depolarizing current above a threshold value evoked only one action potential. However, spiking at frequencies of up to 200 cycles s(-1) was evoked by the injection of depolarizing pulses separated by short hyperpolarizing currents. We suggest that the properties of the inward sodium and outward potassium currents permit high frequency firing in response to a pulsatile depolarizing input of the kind expected in fast swimming, whilst safeguarding against tetany during a strong depolarization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207