Reconhecer a diferença: o desafio da Etnopsiquiatria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo Reconhecer a diferença do Outro é o fundamento da etnopsiquiatria, que é necessariamente múltipla e portadora de nuances e de diferenças. É com base na prática clínica no Serviço de Auxílio Psicológico Especializado aos Imigrantes e Refugiados – Sapsir, em Quebec, Canadá, que os autores propõem outro olhar sobre essa disciplina, levando em consideração a dimensão cultural e psíquica da pessoa; apoiam-se também sobre os universos existenciais e humanistas como a necessidade de sentido, de continuidade de si mesmo e de coerência, assim como sobre as diversas dimensões da identidade. O dispositivo clínico proposto, de acordo com os princípios da etnopsiquiatria, articula-se em três eixos: trabalho sobre as relações, trabalho sobre as diferentes dimensões da identidade, trabalho sobre a coerência e o sentido das situações vividas. Essa abordagem permite acompanhar e facilitar as elaborações essenciais implicadas no trabalho psíquico dos refugiados e das pessoas que foram expostas a situações extremas, como a tortura. Acknowledging difference: the challenge of ethno-psychiatryAbstract acknowledging the Other’s difference is the basis of ethno-psychiatry, which is necessarily multiple and bears subtleties and variations. Based on their practice at the Service d’aide psychologique spécialisée aux immigrants et réfugiés – SAPSIR, Quebec/Canada, the authors propose another perspective for this discipline, taking into account the individual’s cultural and psychological features, the various dimensions of identity, as well as existential and humanistic universals such as the self’s need for meaning, continuity and coherence. The proposed clinical approach, according to the principles of ethno-psychiatry, is structured around three axes: working on links, working on different dimensions of identity, and working on the coherence and meaning of experienced situations. This approach allows following and facilitating essential elaborations involved in the psychological care to refugees and individuals exposed to extreme situations such as torture. Reconocer la diferencia: el reto de la etnopsiquiatríaResumen El reconocimiento de la diferencia del Otro es la base de la etnopsiquiatría, la cual es necesariamente múltiple y en sí portadora de sutilezas y diferencias. Es a partir de su práctica en el Servicio de Ayuda Psicológica Especializada para los Inmigrantes y Refugiados – SAPSIR, Quebec/Canadá que los autores proponen otra visión acerca de esta disciplina. Se apoyan en los universales esenciales y humanistas, tales como la necesidad de sentido, de continuidad de sí y de coherencia, así como en el sentido de las situaciones vividas. El dispositivo clínico propuesto se articula alrededor de tres ejes: el trabajo en los enlaces, en las diferentes dimensiones de la identidad y en la coherencia y el sentido de las situaciones vividas. Este paso permite acompañar y facilitar las elaboraciones esenciales implicadas en el trabajo psíquico de los refugiados y de las personas que han sido expuestas a situaciones extremas, tales como la tortura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".