MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014705550 · doi:10.1525/var.2007.23.1.92

Visual Ethnography Among the Balkan Pomak

2007· article· en· W2014705550 on OpenAlexaff
Asen Balikci

Bibliographic record

VenueVisual Anthropology Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographyPeasantPortraitBulgarianMulticulturalismStyle (visual arts)FundamentalismNationalismSociologyGender studiesHistoryAnthropologyPolitical scienceArtVisual artsArt historyPoliticsLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a brief description of four ethnographic films about the Pomak, Bulgarian speaking Muslims inhabiting the Rhodopi mountains in Southern Bulgaria. The first (1994) is the result of a training workshop in visual ethnography for local boys and girls living in a multicultural setting. The second (1995) describes the roles of Pomak women in a traditional village while the third (1995) is a portrait of an elderly Pomak peasant after 50 years of communist rule. The last production (2004) is a statement about the complex ideological pressures felt by the Pomak stemming from Islamic fundamentalism, peripheral pan‐Turkism, Bulgarian school nationalism, American style mass culture, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVisual Anthropology ReviewSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207