MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014736818 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-949618

Iodic Acid (HIO<sub>3</sub>)

2006· article· en· W2014736818 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Choghamarani

Bibliographic record

VenueSynlett · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDehydrogenationReagentHalogenationOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iodic acid (HIO3) has attracted much interest owing to its potential as oxidant, [1-8] reagent [9-12] and acidic source. [13] [14] The use of iodic acid has been known for a long time and has been widely employed in numerous and different ­organic reactions such as: oxidation of sulfides, [1] [3] iodination, [10] [12] deprotection, [13] nitrosation, [14] and dehydrogenation of aldehydes and ketones. [15] This reagent has several advantages: cost-effectiveness, non-toxicity, easy and clean workup of products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynlettSame topicOxidative Organic Chemistry ReactionsFrench-language works237,207