MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014752362 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20131807

Fracture Propagation Comparison in Two Analogous Shale Reservoirs - Eagle Ford and Vaca Muerta Shale Fracture Mechanisms

2013· article· en· W2014752362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Azra N. Tutuncu, Antón Padín

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingOil shalePetroleum engineeringEagleGeologyShale gasTight oilFracture (geology)Fossil fuelDirectional drillingGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPaleontologyDrillingWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economical production rates in shale reservoirs are achieved solely by hydraulic fracturing the pay zones on horizontal wells with multiple stages and millions of gallons of water. Hydraulic fracturing has been revealed as an essential tool for the successful development of unconventional resources in North America. In fact, last few years, the expertise developed in the USA and Canada has attracted interests from Oil and Gas players in South America due to the enormous potential of shale gas and oil reserves in parts of the continent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207