Overwintering Ability of<i>Liriomyza huidobrensis</i>(Blanchard) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in Southern Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Survival after cold chilling and spring emergence of pea leafminer, Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard), were evaluated in both the field and laboratory in 2001 and 2002. Spring emergence was evaluated through the use of traps placed in various fields and hoop-houses that had high populations of pea leafminers the previous season. No pea leafminer adults were captured in spring emergence cages during either year. To evaluate cold chilling in the laboratory, a factorial design with three temperatures (approximately −5, 0, and 5°C), eight exposure periods (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 d), and four replicates was employed. Pupal mortality increased as the length of exposure increased, with no survival after 64 d of chilling at any temperature. Chilling exposure periods in the laboratory were compared with the number of days per month that soil temperatures in the study area fell below 5, 0, and −5°C. No field-collected pupae exposed to winter field conditions survived until the spring. The pea leafminer seems to be unable to overwinter in southern Ontario, except in protected areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".