MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014764450 · doi:10.1080/00103624.2011.587572

Cadmium Concentration in Flax Colonized by Mycorrhizal Fungi Depends on Soil Phosphorus and Cadmium Concentrations

2011· article· en· W2014764450 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaopeng Gao, Mario Tenuta, Donald N. Flaten, Cynthia A. Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadmiumPhosphorusShootRhizosphereInoculationChemistryFungusHyphaSoil waterMycorrhizaHorticultureAgronomyBotanyBiologySymbiosisBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus on cadmium (Cd) concentration in flax was investigated in a pot experiment. Flax inoculated with Glomus intraradices and uninoculated controls were grown in a pasteurized soil that received Cd (0, 2.5, and 10 mg kg−1) and phosphorus (P; 10 and 50 mg kg−1) additions. Root colonization was not affected by Cd addition but was reduced by high P addition. Effect of G. intraradices on Cd was evident only at low P supply. Inoculation with G. intraradices decreased shoot Cd at no or low Cd addition, which was attributed to reduced root-to-shoot Cd translocation. In contrast, G. intraradices inoculation increased shoot Cd at high Cd addition, which might be associated with the greater absorption of Cd by extraradical hyphae and lower rhizosphere pH. Our results indicate that a benefit of AM fungus in reducing Cd in crops is achievable at Cd and P concentrations commonly in agricultural soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207