MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014768544 · doi:10.1139/l10-037

Length requirements for single-arc asymmetrical sag vertical curve for highways

2010· article· en· W2014768544 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Said M. Easa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSafety Warnings and Signage
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArc lengthArc (geometry)Function (biology)SightMathematicsCrestGeometryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the length requirements for a single-arc asymmetrical vertical curve (sag type) for highways that complements two other papers on the curve development and the length requirements (crest type) that have been published. The single-arc, asymmetrical curve takes the form of a cubic instead of parabolic function and its rate of change in grade gradually varies between the start and the end of the curve. The paper presents the length requirements of the single-arc asymmetrical curve based on the headlight, comfort, and overpass criteria. For the headlight criterion, sight distance (SD) relationships are first developed for the new curve considering different locations of the driver and object. The SD profile and minimum sight distance are then examined. Design aids are then established. The results show that the length requirements based on the comfort criteria are about 60% of those of the headlight criteria. The new single-arc asymmetrical curve improves curve characteristics, and as such would be of interest to the highway design community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicSafety Warnings and SignageFrench-language works237,207