MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014773432 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2207050

Millimeter-Wave Integrated Pyramidal Horn Antenna Made of Multilayer Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Process

2012· article· en· W2014773432 on OpenAlexaff
Nasser Ghassemi, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorn antennaPrinted circuit boardMaterials scienceBandwidth (computing)WidebandDirectional antennaFrench hornFabricationSlot antennaOptoelectronicsOpticsAcousticsAntenna (radio)Electrical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the low atmospheric absorption over W-band, numerous applications are expected, which should be developed at low cost. Short wavelength makes the dimension of antennas in this frequency range small, which usually requires sophisticated and expensive fabrication process. This communication presents a class of integrated wideband pyramidal horn antennas which can be made of low-cost multilayered printed circuit board (PCB) process. The proposed horn antenna radiates along the broadside to the substrate and uses substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) as its feeder. Transverse slot on the top metallic surface at the end of SIW is deployed to drive the horn antenna. Metalized via holes are used to synthesize the horn walls. The opening of the horn antenna is discretely flared from the bottom to the top layer. Measured bandwidth of the antenna is 35 GHz (70-105 GHz) while a relatively constant gain of 10 ± 1 dB is obtained over most of the bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207