Exploratory data analysis reveals visuovisual interhemispheric transfer in functional magnetic resonance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used an exploratory data analysis approach to detect interhemispheric processing of complex visual stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A crossed-uncrossed visual field paradigm was used to elicit interhemispheric transfer of picture/word information. Under the uncrossed (control) condition, the stimuli were presented to the preferential hemispheres (pictures to the left visual field/right hemisphere and words to the right visual field/left hemisphere). Under the crossed condition, the visual field presentation was switched in order to elicit increased interhemispheric processing. Fuzzy cluster analysis revealed significantly more crossed activity in cortical areas near the splenium of the corpus callosum. As expected, examination of the activation revealed smaller responses in perisplenial regions (relative to visual responses in the medial extrastriate regions). The exploratory results were compared with those obtained from parametric and masked analyses. The findings confirm that fMRI can be used to detect interhemispheric transfer of picture/word information. The activation was optimally characterized using exploratory data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".