MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014804342 · doi:10.1115/gt2014-27093

Application of Complex Demodulation for Pseudo-Key-Phasor Recovery From Fast-Response Pressure Measurements

2014· article· en· W2014804342 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan W. Ilott, W. Allan, Asad Asghar

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorDemodulationRotor (electric)SIGNAL (programming language)Synchronization (alternating current)Key (lock)Computer scienceFuzePressure sensorElectronic engineeringHelicopter rotorControl theory (sociology)Phase (matter)VibrationEngineeringAcousticsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When digitizing the output of fast-response pressure transducers installed on rotating machinery, it is often desirable to use a phase-synchronized method. The mechanical design of many turbomachines, particularly those not originally designed for a research application, can make it difficult to install the physical key-phasor needed to acquire phase-synchronized measurements. A method of phase-synchronization using a pseudo-key-phasor is presented in this paper. The technique applies complex demodulation to recover a pseudo-key-phasor signal from the blade-passing signal recorded in sampled data. The recovered pseudo-key-phasor is then used to digitally resample the data at a constant phase angle, removing the effect of small rotor speed variations. Example applications of this technique to vibration measurements can be found in the literature; however, examples of application to rotor pressure measurement were not. The technique has been applied to fast-response pressure measurements taken on the shroud of a high speed centrifugal compressor. It was found that this technique was able to remove the effect of rotor speed variations from data sampled with equal time intervals, making them suitable for phase averaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and MetallurgySame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207