MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014817992 · doi:10.1586/17469899.2013.817720

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: untreatable at present?

2013· article· en· W2014817992 on OpenAlexaff
Devin D. Mackay, Edward J. Atkins, Nancy J. Newman, Valérie Biousse

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Ophthalmology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyOptic neuropathyOptic nerveOphthalmologyClinical trialRandomized controlled trialProspective cohort studySurgeryIschemic optic neuropathyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is the most common acute optic neuropathy in patients aged over 50 years and results from ischemic damage to the anterior optic nerve. Proposed treatments for NAION presumably target thrombosis, blood vessels or disc edema or may have a neuroprotective effect. However, no controlled prospective clinical trials have shown benefit for any medical or surgical treatments. Most of the literature on the treatment of NAION consists of retrospective or prospective case series and case reports. IONDT is the only large multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial performed for NAION and it found no benefit for surgical intervention. There is a debate over the utility of steroids, both oral and intravitreal, and over the use of intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents. Similarly, therapies aimed at secondary prevention of fellow eye involvement in NAION remain of unproven benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of OphthalmologySame topicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207