Feature and instance selection via cooperative PSO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advances in data collection and storage capabilities during the past decades have led to an information overload in most application domains. The huge amount of data the real-world applications has necessitated the use of a reduction mechanism. The reduction method contains two main techniques: feature selection and instance selection, which are usually applied individually. Although, some work has been done to implement the feature and instance selection simultaneously, this work has focused on mainly the classification problem. This paper proposes the integration of feature selection and instance selection for solving the regression problem by using the fuzzy modeling approach. The selection of features and instances is based on the cooperative particle swarm optimization technique, which aims to limit the effect of the curse of dimensionality that occurs when dealing with the high dimensionality of the search space. The proposed method is applied to three real-world datasets from the machine learning repository. The algorithm's performance is illustrated by the corresponding plots of the prediction error for the different amounts of data being selected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it