Late Ordovician brachiopod endemism and faunal gradient along palaeotropical latitudes in Laurentia during a major sea level rise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The palaeocontinent Laurentia experienced pulses of major marine transgression during the Late Ordovician (Katian) and was covered by extensive equatorial to subtropical epicontinental seas. Brachiopods that evolved in the newly created habitats showed increasingly strong endemism from the early to late Katian. At the faunal level, the Laurentian epicontinental brachiopod (LEB) fauna became ubiquitous in the epicontinental seas, with a high level of generic homogeneity but little in common with the coeval faunas in other palaeotropically located tectonic plates. At the level of species distribution, there was limited mixing between palaeoequatorial intracratonic basins and higher tropical to subtropical pericratonic shelves within Laurentia by late Katian. This was demonstrated by the palaeogeographical distribution of several species lineages and morphological clines along latitudinal and other ecological gradients. Such a high level of endemism suggests an extreme specialization of the LEB fauna in the tropical epicontinental seas, which made it most vulnerable to the drastic climate change and mass extinction during the Hirnantian glaciation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".