Predictors of Hip Disease in the Systemic Arthritis Subtype of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hip involvement occurs in 20%-40% of all cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Patients with systemic JIA (sJIA) are affected most frequently. The aim of our study was to investigate the predictors of clinical hip disease and radiographic hip damage in sJIA. METHODS: The medical records (1997-2007) of all children (n = 98) with sJIA were reviewed. Potential clinical and laboratory predictors were examined at presentation and at 3 and 6 months. To account for censored observations, we used survival analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 59 children met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 7.8 years. Thirty patients (51%) developed clinical hip disease, with 12 (20%) developing radiographic evidence of hip damage. The median time to develop clinical hip disease was 24 months. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, 25% of patients develop radiographically evident hip damage within 43 months. At presentation, patients in whom clinical hip disease later developed had polyarthritis (hazard ratio 2.51, p = 0.01), elevated IgG (HR 1.12, p = 0.01) and IgM (HR 2.71, p = 0.02), and higher CHAQ scores (HR 1.65, p = 0.02). At 3 months after disease onset, patients in whom radiographic hip damage later developed had fever (HR 4.78, p = 0.02), polyarthritis (HR 4.63, p = 0.02), and higher CHAQ scores (HR 3.20, p = 0.005). At 6 months, polyarthritis was the strongest predictor of both clinical hip disease and radiographic hip damage. CONCLUSION: Half of patients with sJIA develop clinical hip disease a median time of 24 months from diagnosis. Early identification of predictors of hip disease and damage in patients with sJIA may suggest earlier, more aggressive interventions to prevent joint destruction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".