MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014928817 · doi:10.1121/1.1932212

The transmission loss of curved laminates and sandwich composite panels

2005· article· en· W2014928817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthotropic materialMaterials scienceShearing (physics)Composite laminatesTransmission lossRotary inertiaComposite numberAcousticsInertiaStructural engineeringComposite materialPhysicsFinite element methodClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper describes a model to calculate the transmission loss of both curved laminate and sandwich composite panels within statistical energy analysis (SEA) context. The vibro-acoustic problem is developed following a wave approach based on a discrete lamina description. Each lamina is considered to consist of membrane, bending, transverse shearing and rotational inertia behaviors. Moreover, the orthotropic ply angle of each lamina is considered. Using such a discrete lamina description, the dispersion behaviors of the panel are correctly represented. Using the dispersion curves, the radiation efficiency, the modal density, as well as, the nonresonant and the resonant transmission are computed. Moreover, expression for the evaluation of the ring frequency and the critical frequencies of such panels is given. The described model is shown to handle accurately, both laminate and sandwich composite shells. Additionally, a transmission loss test is presented to confirm the validity of the presented model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it