Protective effect of active oxygen scavengers on protein degradation and photochemical function in photosystem I submembrane fractions during light stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protective role of reactive oxygen scavengers against photodamage was studied in isolated photosystem (PS) I submembrane fractions illuminated (2000 microE x m(-2) x s(-1)) for various periods at 4 degrees C. The photochemical activity of the submembrane fractions measured as P700 photooxidation was significantly protected in the presence of histidine or n-propyl gallate. Chlorophyll photobleaching resulting in a decrease of absorbance and fluorescence, and a blue-shift of both absorbance and fluorescence maximum in the red region, was also greatly delayed in the presence of these scavengers. Western blot analysis revealed the light harvesting antenna complexes of PSI, Lhca2 and Lhca1, were more susceptible to strong light when compared to Lhca3 and Lhca4. The reaction-center proteins PsaB, PsaC, and PsaE were most sensitive to strong illumination while other polypeptides were less affected. Addition of histidine or n-propyl gallate lead to significant protection of reaction-center proteins as well as Lhca against strong illumination. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra revealed that the alpha-helix content decreased with increasing period of light exposure, whereas beta-strands, turns, and unordered structure increased. This unfolding was prevented with the addition of histidine or n-propyl gallate even after 10 h of strong illumination. Catalase or superoxide dismutase could not minimize the alteration of PSI photochemical activity and structure due to photodamage. The specific action of histidine and n-propyl gallate indicates that 1O2 was the main form of reactive oxygen species responsible for strong light-induced damage in PSI submembrane fractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".