"La Fortuna, por siempre y para siempre”, a cross-generational and participatory documentary
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we reflect about the participatory video methodology, use video creatively in group development work, through the creation process of “La Fortuna por siempre y para siempre”documentary; a personal point of view from twenty eight children, six youngsters and nine adults about life and living together in the neighborhood “La Fortuna”. Photo camaras, vídeo camaras, words, feellings and creativity are the tolls they used. 
 The documentary is part of a communication and educational project that invites the participants to use video and photographic language to reflect on their identity and the world where they live. Most local people live in difficult situation and the neighborhood have a very high ratio of inmigrants. 
 The documentary project promotes the active participation and the social integration of people and collectives from different ages, social conditions, origins and cultures. 
 It was organized by the Intercultural and Emigration Program of La Fortuna Local Government Cabinet depended on Leganés City Council.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it