MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014975780 · doi:10.1080/19320248.2010.489369

Milk Insecurity: Accounts of a Food Insecurity Phenomenon in Canada and Its Relation to Public Policy

2010· article· en· W2014975780 on OpenAlex
Patricia L. Williams, Lynn McIntyre, N. Theresa Glanville

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityPhenomenonScarcityFocus groupPurchasing powerPopulationNova scotiaFood securityBusinessDemographic economicsSocioeconomicsEconomic growthEconomicsEnvironmental healthGeographyMedicineMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the phenomenon of milk insecurity among low-income lone mothers in Nova Scotia, Canada. Focus group and in-depth interviews were conducted and analyzed to assess challenges mothers faced in accessing milk for their families and the ways in which they coped with milk scarcity. Milk insecurity is a distinct feature of food insecurity for this population, with potentially serious health implications. Just as food insecurity is structurally determined through inadequate income, so too is milk insecurity. However, in Canada it is further exacerbated by public policy that sets the price of this staple too high relative to the purchasing power of the poor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it