Hips with Synovial Chondromatosis May Display the Features of Femoroacetabular Impingement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Both synovial chondromatosis and femoroacetabular impingement present with hip pain and may lead to hip osteoarthritis. We present a small case series and describe the clinical presentation, investigation, and treatment of patients with synovial chondromatosis who also had cam-type femoroacetabular impingement involving the same hip. Methods: Five patients (four men and one woman with a mean age of thirty-four years [range, thirty to thirty-seven years]) with unilateral synovial chondromatosis of the hip presented with clinical and radiographic features of ipsilateral cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. The diagnosis of associated synovial chondromatosis was made on the basis of preoperative imaging in four of the cases. All patients were treated with surgical hip dislocation, excision of the synovial chondromatosis loose bodies, and reshaping of the femoral head-neck junction. Results: These hips exhibited radiographic features that are not typically seen with idiopathic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, including femoral head hypertrophy, lateralization of the femoral head, and haziness in the acetabular fossa. None of the hips showed signs of advanced osteoarthritis intraoperatively. The alpha angle improved from a mean of 72.4° preoperatively to 42.6° postoperatively. At a mean of twenty-two months of follow-up, the patients had a mean Harris hip score of 80.6, substantially improved from the preoperative value of 39. Conclusions: Hips with synovial chondromatosis may present with clinical and radiographic features resembling those of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. As simultaneous treatment of both conditions is best accomplished with surgical hip dislocation rather than other, less-extensive surgical approaches, we recommend preoperative consideration of synovial chondromatosis in patients presenting with unilateral cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Peer Review This article was reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and one Deputy Editor, and it underwent blinded review by two or more outside experts. The Deputy Editor reviewed each revision of the article, and it underwent a final review by the Editor-in-Chief prior to publication. Final corrections and clarifications occurred during one or more exchanges between the author(s) and copyeditors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".