MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015024396 · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000168

Proteomic analysis of egg white proteins during storage

2010· article· en· W2015024396 on OpenAlexaff
Dileep A. Omana, Yue Liang, Nat N. V. Kav

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClusterin in disease pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvotransferrinOvalbuminEgg whiteProteomeStorage proteinClusterinBiologyChemistryProteolysisProteomicsAndrologyBiochemistryImmunologyEnzymeImmune systemMedicineApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Egg storage causes egg white to lose its viscous nature to form a thin liquid, commonly referred to as egg white thinning. To understand the mechanisms underlying egg white thinning, white-shell eggs were used in the present study to determine the proteome-level changes of egg white proteins occurred during storage. Egg white thinning was observed visually after 20 days of storage at ambient temperature (22 ± 2 °C) when the maximum number of proteome-level changes occurred. The proteins that showed significant changes in abundance during storage included ovalbumin, clusterin, ovoinhibitor, ovotransferrin, and prostaglandin D2 synthase. Among these, only the abundance of clusterin was observed to change continuously during the storage period. Hence, it is expected that the increase in the concentrations of clusterin and ovoinhibitor along with the change of ovalbumin content during storage might contribute to egg white thinning. Degradation of ovalbumin/clusterin during egg storage may be due to the combined effect of proteolysis and increase in pH; this may also be partly responsible for egg white thinning phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROTEOMICSSame topicClusterin in disease pathologyFrench-language works237,207