MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015056581 · doi:10.1109/icpst.2006.321953

Aggregating Induction Motors in a Power System Based on their Standard Specifications

2006· article· en· W2015056581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorComputer sciencePower (physics)Control engineeringAutomotive engineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many different induction motors are operating in a power system. Representing their aggregate effects must be undertaken due to the computational burden of their detail representations. It is much simpler to compose induction motors in power systems based on their standard specifications than on their circuit parameters. This paper presents a novel method for aggregating induction motors at different buses in power systems. The proposed technique has been developed from the standard specifications of the considered motors. It has been proved that the method can closely represent a group of induction motors in power networks. This paper describes the detailed derivation of the proposed technique and proves its validity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Power Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207