Une étude exploratoire des sources de stress et de soutien social chez les intervenantes communautaires en santé mentale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'objectif de cette recherche exploratoire est d'identifier les principales sources de stress au travail et d'épuisement professionnel chez les intervenantes en santé mentale oeuvrant en milieu communautaire et d'examiner le soutien social qu'elles reçoivent. Les informations ont été recueillies au cours d'entrevues individuelles et d'entrevues de groupe auxquelles ont participé 19 intervenantes provenant de trois centres de crise de Montréal. Les principaux facteurs de stress qu'identifient les participantes ont trait à des dimensions relevant de l'intervention auprès des usagers et du rôle d'intervenante. Des difficultés spécifiques au travail en milieu communautaire sont aussi rapportées. Le soutien reçu des collègues de travail et la qualité des relations avec la direction ressortent comme facteurs importants de protection contre le stress et l'épuisèment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".