Harmonic mappings of an annulus, Nitsche conjecture and its generalizations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
\def\xxlong{\mathop{{\rm onto}\atop \longrightarrow}\nolimits} As long ago as 1962 Nitsche conjectured that a harmonic homeomorphism $h \colon \ A(r,R) \xxlong A(r_\ast, R_\ast)$ between planar annuli exists if and only if $ \frac{R_\ast}{r_\ast} \ge \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{R} {r} + \frac{r}{R}\right)$. We prove this conjecture when the domain annulus is not too wide; explicitly, when $R \le e^{3/2} r$. We also treat the general annuli $A(r,R)$, $ 0 0$r$R\infty$, and obtain the sharp Nitsche bound under additional assumption that either $h$ or its normal derivative have vanishing average along the inner circle of $A(r,R)$. We consider the family of Jordan curves in $A(r_*,R_*)$ obtained as images under $h$ of concentric circles in $A(r,R)$. We refer to such family of Jordan curves as harmonic evolution of the inner boundary of $A(r,R) $. In the borderline case $ \frac{R_\ast}{r_\ast} = \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{R}{r} + \frac{r}{R}\right)$ the evolution begins with zero speed. It will be shown, as a generalization of the Nitsche Conjecture, that harmonic evolution with positive initial speed results in greater ratio $\frac{R_\ast}{r_\ast}$ in the deformed (target) annulus. To every initial speed there corresponds an underlying differential operator which yields sharp lower bounds of $\frac{R_\ast}{r_\ast}$ in our generalization of the Nitsche Conjecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it