MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015128676 · doi:10.1021/ja104578n

<sup>13</sup>CHD<sub>2</sub> Methyl Group Probes of Millisecond Time Scale Exchange in Proteins by <sup>1</sup>H Relaxation Dispersion: An Application to Proteasome Gating Residue Dynamics

2010· article· en· W2015128676 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew J. Baldwin, Tomasz L. Religa, D. Flemming Hansen, Guillaume Bouvignies, Lewis E. Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryMillisecondIsotopomersDispersion (optics)Relaxation (psychology)Methyl groupAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ProtonNuclear magnetic resonanceMoleculeGroup (periodic table)ChromatographyPhysicsOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pulse scheme is presented for quantifying millisecond time scale chemical exchange processes in proteins by measuring (1)H CPMG relaxation dispersion profiles of (13)CHD(2) methyl groups. The use of (13)CHD(2) isotopomers for (1)H methyl dispersion experiments eliminates problems with interconversion between differentially relaxing proton transitions that complicate the extraction of accurate exchange parameters when (13)CH(3) probes are used. Good agreement is demonstrated between extracted chemical shift differences from fits of dispersion profiles and the corresponding differences measured independently on a model exchanging system, validating the experiment. The methodology is applied to the gating residues of the T. acidiphilium proteasome that are shown to undergo extensive motion on the millisecond time scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207