Photoluminescence of cerium fluoride and cerium-doped lanthanum fluoride nanoparticles and investigation of energy transfer to photosensitizer molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CexLa1-xF3 nanoparticles have been proposed for use in nanoscintillator-photosensitizer systems, where excitation of nanoparticles by ionizing radiation would result in energy transfer to photosensitizer molecules, effectively combining the effects of radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy. Thus far, there have been few experimental investigations of such systems. This study reports novel synthesis methods for water-dispersible Ce0.1La0.9F3/LaF3 and CeF3/LaF3 core/shell nanoparticles and an investigation of energy transfer to photosensitizers. Unbound deuteroporphyrin IX 2,4-disulfonic acid was found to substantially quench the luminescence of large (>10 nm diameter) aminocaproic acid-stabilized nanoparticles at reasonable concentrations and loading amounts: up to 80% quenching at 6% w/w photosensitizer loading. Energy transfer was found to occur primarily through a cascade, with excitation of "regular" site Ce(3+) at 252 nm relayed to photosensitizer molecules at the nanoparticle surface through intermediate "perturbed" Ce(3+) sites. Smaller (<5 nm) citrate-stabilized nanoparticles were coated with the bisphosphonate alendronate, allowing covalent conjugation to chlorin e6 and resulting in static quenching of the nanoparticle luminescence: ∼50% at ∼0.44% w/w. These results provide insight into energy transfer mechanisms that may prove valuable for optimizing similar systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".