Respiratory Chemosensitivity during Wake and Sleep in Harbour Seal Pups (<i>Phoca vitulina richardsii</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we examined the cardiorespiratory patterns of harbour seal pups under normoxic/normocarbic (air), hypoxic/normocarbic (15%, 12%, and 9% O2 in air), and normoxic/hypercarbic (2%, 4%, and 6% CO2 in air) conditions while awake and sleeping on land. Animals were chronically instrumented to record electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG), and electrocardiogram (EKG) signals, which, along with respiration (whole-body plethysmography) and oxygen consumption (VO2), were recorded from animals breathing each gas mixture for 2-4 h on separate days. Our results show that for animals breathing air, VO2 was not significantly lower during slow-wave sleep (SWS; 7.71 +/- 0.39 mL O2 min(-1) kg(-1); all measurements are mean +/- SEM) than during wakefulness (WAKE; 8.80 +/- 0.25 mL O2 min(-1) kg(-1)) and was unaffected by changes in respiratory drive. Although there was no significant fall in VO2 associated with a decrease in arousal state, breathing frequency (f(R)) did decrease (from 18.80 +/- 1.50 breaths min(-1) in WAKE to 10.40 +/- 0.49 breaths min(-1) in SWS), while the incidence of long apneas (>20 s) increased (12.76 +/- 4.06 apneas h(-1) in WAKE and 31.95 +/- 2.37 apneas h(-1) in SWS). Breathing was rarely seen during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Tachypnea was present at all levels of increased respiratory drive; however, hypoxia induced a dramatic bradycardia regardless of arousal state, while hypercarbia produced a tachycardia in SWS only. The hypoxic and hypercarbic chemosensitivities of harbour seal pups were similar to those of terrestrial mammals; however, unlike terrestrial mammals, where hypoxic and hypercarbic sensitivities are often reduced during SWS, the sensitivity of harbour seal pups to hypoxia and hypercarbia remained unchanged during the decrease in arousal state from WAKE to SWS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".