On Achievable SNR Region for Multi-User Multi-Carrier Asynchronous Bidirectional Relay Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the problem of obtaining achievable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region and the corresponding rate region for an asynchronous bidirectional multi-carrier relay network which consists of two transceivers and multiple relays. We assume that each relaying path, corresponding to each relay, causes a delay in the signal transmitted by one of the transceivers when this signal goes through that relay and arrives at the other transceiver. This delay depends on the distance traveled by the signal. Hence, different relaying paths incur different delays in the signal time of arrival at each of the two transceivers. In our data model, we take into account that these delays are different for different relaying paths. Assuming distributed beamforming at the relays and power control at the transceivers, we characterize the achievable SNR region and the corresponding rate region for this network. Such a characterization is performed when each subcarrier is used to enable bidirectional communication between several outer transceivers. To do so, we present our optimization framework and examine its structure, thereby showing how it can be solved. We prove that for the case where the rates over different subcarriers at each transceiver are constrained to be equal, our approach leads to semi-closed-form solutions for the relay beamforming weights and transceivers' subcarrier powers and for the boundaries of the SNR region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".