Classification and Proposed Nomenclature for Inherited Defects of Thyroid Hormone Action, Cell Transport, and Metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) was first described in 1967 [1], and the first mutations in the THRB gene were identified in 1989 [2,3], only 3 years after the cloning of the THR genes [4,5]. The cardinal features of this syndrome of reduced sensitivity to thyroid hormone are elevated serum levels of free thyroid hormone with nonsuppressed TSH, often with goiter and no clear symptoms and signs of thyrotoxicosis [6]. In fact, signs of decreased and increased thyroid hormone action in different tissues may coexist. During the First International Workshop on Resistance to Thyroid Hormone in Cambridge, United Kingdom in 1993, a consensus statement was issued to establish a unified nomenclature of THRB gene mutations in RTH [7], as defined above. In the ensuing years more than 3,000 cases have been identified, 80% of which harbored mutations in the THRB gene. More recently, two syndromes with reduced cellular access of the biologically active thyroid hormone, T3, were identified. These are caused by defects of thyroid hormone cell membrane transport [8,9] and a defect reducing the intracellular metabolism generating T3 from T4[10]. To accommodate these new findings, it was proposed to broaden the definition of hormone resistance. Thus, the Fifth International Workshop on Resistance to Thyroid Hormone, which took place in Lyon, France, in 2005, saw the introduction of the term ‘reduced sensitivity to thyroid hormone (RSTH) to encompass all defects that can interfere with the biological activity of a chemically intact thyroid hormone secreted in normal or excessive amounts'. Following the 10th International Workshop on Resistance to Thyroid Hormone and Action that took place in Quebec City, Canada, in 2012, a number of investigators took on the task to develop a nomenclature for inherited forms of impaired sensitivity to thyroid hormone (table (table1).1). The term ‘impaired’ was to substitute for ‘reduced’ because nascent data indicate that syndromes of increased sensitivity may also exist. We are cognizant that no nomenclature can fit perfectly all aspects of the described syndromes because variability exists. Several aspects were taken into consideration: the already existing nomenclature, new findings, and anticipated putative discoveries. For example, in over 2000 publications ‘RTH’ is used to define a phenotype of congenitally increased free T4 with nonsuppressed TSH, irrespective of the presence or absence of a THRB gene mutation (see non-TR-RTH). In view of the identification of THRA gene mutations that present a distinct phenotype [11,12], we propose using the term ‘RTH α’, and in new publications to use ‘RTH β’ when a THRB gene mutation is present in association with the RTH phenotype. This allows the naming of new gene defects in individuals with the RTH phenotype. The use of the abbreviation ‘THR’ as a synonym for RTH is discouraged, not only because the hormone is not resistant, but also because this abbreviation is used to denote other circumstances. Indeed, a Medline search using THR yielded over 20,000 references, only a few related to resistance to thyroid hormone. Table 1 Inheritable forms of impaired sensitivity to thyroid hormone
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".