MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015284936 · doi:10.1117/12.596038

Nanoengineered multimodal contrast agent for medical image guidance

2005· article· en· W2015284936 on OpenAlexaff
G. Perkins, Jinzi Zheng, Kristy K. Brock, Christine Allen, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIohexolHounsfield scaleGadoliniumContrast (vision)Magnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringMedicineMedical imagingMaterials scienceComputer scienceRadiologyComputed tomographyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimodality imaging has gained momentum in radiation therapy planning and image-guided treatment delivery. Specifically, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are two complementary imaging modalities often utilized in radiation therapy for visualization of anatomical structures for tumour delineation and accurate registration of image data sets for volumetric dose calculation. The development of a multimodal contrast agent for CT and MR with prolonged <i>in vivo</i> residence time would provide long-lasting spatial and temporal correspondence of the anatomical features of interest, and therefore facilitate multimodal image registration, treatment planning and delivery. The multimodal contrast agent investigated consists of nano-sized stealth liposomes encapsulating conventional iodine and gadolinium-based contrast agents. The average loading achieved was 33.5 ± 7.1 mg/mL of iodine for iohexol and 9.8 ± 2.0 mg/mL of gadolinium for gadoteridol. The average liposome diameter was 46.2 ± 13.5 nm. The system was found to be stable in physiological buffer over a 15-day period, releasing 11.9 ± 1.1% and 11.2 ± 0.9% of the total amounts of iohexol and gadoteridol loaded, respectively. 200 minutes following <i>in vivo</i> administration, the contrast agent maintained a relative contrast enhancement of 81.4 ± 13.05 differential Hounsfield units (&#916;HU) in CT (40% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 3 minutes post-injection) and 731.9 ± 144.2 differential signal intensity (&#916;SI) in MR (46% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 3 minutes post-injection) in the blood (aorta), a relative contrast enhancement of 38.0 ± 5.1 &#916;HU (42% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 3 minutes post-injection) and 178.6 ± 41.4 &#916;SI (62% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 3 minutes post-injection) in the liver (parenchyma), a relative contrast enhancement of 9.1 ± 1.7 &#916;HU (94% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 3 minutes post-injection) and 461.7 ± 78.1 &#916;SI (60% decrease from the peak signal value achieved 5 minutes post-injection) in the kidney (cortex) of a New Zealand white rabbit. This multimodal contrast agent, with prolonged <i>in vivo</i> residence time and imaging efficacy, has the potential to bring about improvements in the fields of medical imaging and radiation therapy, particularly for image registration and guidance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207