MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pharmacology of Pain

2011· article· en· W2015301935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Wilkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePain medicineCLARITYChronic painNeuropharmacologyClinical pharmacologyPsychiatryAnesthesiologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P. Beaulieu, D. Lussier, F. Porreca & A. Dickenson ( Eds ) International Association for the Study of Pain , Seattle , 2010 ISBN 978-0-931092-78-7 , 622 pp., Price £108; US$100 (member price US$80) Pain is a subject that most of us regard as our ‘bread and butter’. Chronic pain anaesthetists practise at one end of the hospital, rarely seen as they are run off their feet in clinics, coping with the expanding chronic pain pandemic we seem to be facing. The acute pain teams frantically move from one surgical ward to another, dealing with the ever-increasing postoperative patient base. Texts have a lot to live up to as their competition and number are so great. The authors of this book have chosen to tackle the pharmacology of pain in huge depth. The writers comprise a physician with an interest in pharmacology research, an anaesthesiologist and a professor of pharmacology and anaesthesiology – all from Canada. Finally, a professor of neuropharmacology from the UK completes the team. Section I of the book starts with a recap of the neurophysiology of pain, beginning at the periphery and its receptors and moving on to a detailed discourse of central pain pathways and complex neuroanatomical/physiological relationships. Next, the authors approach the taxonomy of analgesics with exemplary clarity. There are various clear tables comparing the different existing taxonomies in current use; on reading further it is clear why we all become slightly confused over such classifications, as there appears to be no generic consensus on the correct one to use in everyday practice, or indeed when teaching. Section II explores 14 specific pharmacological pain targets in micro-detail (the cannabinoid system, the cyclo-oxygenase pathway, opioid pathways and the 5-HT receptor system are all examined, as well as others). Armed with this sort of information for a viva, one would expect to be a firm runner for a distinction medal. The authors provide a commendable delineation of the exact modes of action of drugs, at both receptor/effector and microcellular levels. After reading this section, it was clear to me that my knowledge of some of these drugs was somewhat antiquated! It is clear from examining the references and the clear and colourful diagrams that a vast amount of work has gone into this section. Section III focuses on special topics within pain pharmacology. It opens with a fabulous description of addiction and tolerance, from a theoretical and evidence-based platform. The neurophysiological pathways concerned are dissected, revealing that things are far more complicated than we first knew. Patients who seem to lie outside the ‘norm’ are depicted in the next section on pharmacogenetics of pain inhibition. This gives us some idea as to why one patient in recovery seems to have emptied the cupboard of analgesics, while the next patient is narcotised after a minute quantity. Again, the situation is complex, particularly when the list of genes identified extends well into double figures. Following this, the section on why placebo works is enthralling. There are sublime CT and MRI images of the brain, backing up hypotheses from a variety of excellent, well validated studies. The final component to section III discusses animal models of pain. This section may appeal to the more laboratory oriented among us; however, at times I felt mild narcosis myself while attempting to follow some of the complex experimentation and methodology. Finally, the book closes with a section on clinical applications of the pharmacology of pain, including obstetrics, paediatrics, the elderly, obesity and palliative care. In summary, this is a fabulous book, advanced from its outset, but not the easiest of reads. Certainly it offers a wide and experienced knowledge base, backed up by a vast array of clinical and non-clinical research, and I would recommend it for those of us interested in this ever-expanding field of anaesthesia and critical care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesiaSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207