MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015307282 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v1n2p63

Biology of Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae) Predator of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae)

2009· article· es· W2015307282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohd Rasdi Z., I. Fauziah, Wan Mohamad W.A.K, Che Salmah M.R., J. Kamaruzaman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Higher Education, Malaysia
KeywordsTrialeurodesBiologyMiridaeHomopteraGreenhouse whiteflyWhiteflyBiological pest controlPredatorPEST analysisHeteropteraFecundityToxicologyPopulationBotanyPredationEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macrolophus caliginosus Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae) is a highly polyphagous predatory bug, which has proven tobe effective in controlling many insect pests of greenhouse vegetables (eggplant, tomato, and cucumber) especiallywhiteflies, aphids, and thrip. It is mainly used as a biological control auxiliary against T. vaporariorum Westwood(Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). The greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum is particularly harmful to tomatoplants grown under the greenhouse. It has become prevalent whenever crops are frequently sprayed with insecticides.Biological control is becoming important for controlling this insect pest. A mirid bug management programme has beendeveloped for an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in tomato. The objective of the programme was to keep thepredator population densities high enough in order to maintain T. vaporariorum and other insect pest populations belowthe economic threshold. In this study, it was very important to determine the biology of predator in term of its life cycle,behaviour at different stages, fecundity, longevity and searching abilities, in order to provide detail data for formulatingthe means of control against whitefly. Results of this study indicated that Macrolophus caliginosus adults fed onwhitefly larvae of all stages from the first larval stage to the pupal stage. The predator consumed the preys at almostsimilar daily rates (average of 5.94 per day). The study implies that M. caliginosus, with its life cycle, predation,longevity and fecundity and host preference, is a beneficial insect to combat against whitefly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207