<i>In vitro</i> evaluation of B‐domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (ReFacto<sup>®</sup>) stability during simulated continuous infusion administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The administration of factor VIII (FVIII) by continuous infusion (CI) to manage severe haemorrhage or during major surgery appears pharmacokinetically and economically favourable when compared with intermittent bolus infusions. Successful clinical use of FVIII delivered by CI, however, requires a thorough assessment of product stability under conditions encountered during CI such as prolonged exposure to the delivery devices at ambient temperature and the low FVIII concentrations. This investigation has identified conditions under which ReFacto, a recombinant human B-domain deleted FVIII, can be successfully delivered under dilute conditions when using large volume parenteral polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bags without the addition of stabilizers or as an undiluted preparation delivered by ambulatory infusion pumps. ReFacto is stable for 36 h when stored in large volume parenteral PVC reservoirs at 3 and 8 IU mL(-1) or 72 h when delivered undiluted at 62 IU mL(-1) by CADD infusion pumps. The greatest concern with the delivery of ReFacto by CI is adsorptive losses to the contact surfaces of the delivery system. There was no significant binding of ReFacto to the PVC reservoirs overtime; however, there was appreciable binding to the administration set under certain conditions. The binding was influenced by the ionic strength of the solution, residence time in the tubing and protein concentration. The recovery and stability profile of ReFacto under certain conditions appears favourable when compared with that of full-length recombinant FVIII products, observed by other investigators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".