Capacitation Is Associated with Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Tyrosine Kinase-Like Activity of Pig Sperm Proteins1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capacitation represents the final maturational steps that render mammalian sperm competent to fertilize, either in vivo or in vitro. Capacitation is defined as a series of events that enables sperm to bind the oocyte and undergo the acrosome reaction in response to the zona pellucida. Although the molecular mechanisms involved are not fully understood, sperm protein phosphorylation is associated with capacitation. The hypothesis of this study is that protein tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity mediate capacitation of porcine sperm. Fresh sperm were incubated in noncapacitating or capacitating media for various times. Proteins were extracted with SDS, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. An M(r) 32 000 tyrosine-phosphorylated protein (designated as p32) appeared only when the sperm were incubated in capacitating medium and concomitant with capacitation as assessed by the ionophore-induced acrosome reaction. The p32 was soluble in Triton X-100. Fractionation of sperm proteins with Triton X-114 demonstrated that after capacitation, this tyrosine phosphoprotein is located in both the cytosol and the membrane. Enzyme renaturation of sperm proteins was conducted in gels with or without either poly glu:tyr (a tyrosine kinase substrate) or kemptide (a protein kinase A substrate). An M(r) 32 000 enzyme with kinase behavior was observed in all gels but was preferentially phosphorylated on tyrosine, as assessed by phosphorimagery and by thin layer chromotography to identify the phosphoamino acids. Indirect immunolocalization showed that the phosphotyrosine residues redistribute to the acrosome during capacitation, which is an appropriate location for a protein involved in the acquisition of fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".