Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partant d’une réflexion théorique liée à une recherche sur le secret militaire, cet article tente de mettre en relation les mutations du pouvoir à l’œuvre depuis les trente dernières années et les enjeux démocratiques liés aux sociétés du risque à partir d’une question éthique essentielle : le statut du secret dans les démocraties. Il s’agit d’une question éthique au sens où la revendication d’un droit à la connaissance est devenue une question politique fondamentale au sein des sociétés technoscientifiques, reposant sur une apparente contradiction : la démocratie suppose une large diffusion de la connaissance, préalable à la prise de décision, alors que le pouvoir repose fondamentalement sur une logique de séparation propre au secret. Au-delà des excès du secret – qui peut recouvrir des formes de corruption – et de ceux de la transparence – essence du totalitarisme –, existe-t-il des issues qui nous conduiraient vers une démocratie authentique ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".