Differential Expression of Glutathione Reductase and Cytosolic Glutathione Peroxidase, GPX1, in Developing Rat Lungs and Kidneys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mutant rat GPX1 (a cytosolic predominant form), in which the selenocysteine residue in the catalytic center was replaced by cysteine, was prepared and an antibody against the mutant enzyme was raised. The resultant antibody specifically reacted with rat GPX1 and was, together with the Glutathione reductase (GR) antibody, used in a Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry experiments. To elucidate the physiological coupling of these enzymes under oxidative stress which accompanies the birth, developmental changes of the protein levels and enzymatic activities of GR and GPX1 were examined for lungs and kidneys from prenatal fetus to adult rats. The expression of GR was already evident at the prenatal stage and remained high in lungs at all stages. However, GR activity in kidneys gradually increased after birth reaching maximal levels at adulthood. An immunohistochemical study showed that GR was strongly bound to the bronchial epithelia in lungs and the epithelial cells of renal tubes. GPX1 was expressed in the renal tube epithelial cells and its level gradually increased after birth in a manner similar to that of GR. The expression of GPX1 in the lungs was, on the other hand, variable and occurred in some alveolar cells and bronchial epithelia only at restricted periods. It preferentially localized in nuclei at a late stage of development. Thus, the expression of the two functionally coupled enzymes via GSH did not appear to coordinate with development, tissue localization or under oxidative stress. Since many gene products show GSH-dependent preoxidase activity, other peroxidase(s) may be induced to compensate for the low GPX1 levels at stages with high GR expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".